Which is an example of a misconfiguration identified by SSPM?

The identification of failing to enable multi-factor authentication for Office 365 apps as a misconfiguration by SSPM (Security Standards and Policies Management) is accurate because multi-factor authentication (MFA) plays a crucial role in enhancing security by requiring users to provide multiple forms of verification before gaining access to sensitive applications. In the context of cloud-based services like Office 365, not enabling MFA significantly increases the risk of unauthorized access, particularly considering the prevalence of phishing attacks and credential theft.

SPPM is designed to monitor and enforce security policies, ensuring that configurations align with best practices. Therefore, the absence of MFA would be categorized as a misconfiguration, as it directly contradicts established security guidelines aimed at protecting accounts and data from breaches. This highlights the importance of implementing robust authentication mechanisms to safeguard access to critical business applications.

In contrast, while the other options may indicate security concerns or weaknesses, they are not typically categorized directly as misconfigurations within the context of SSPM tools; rather, they represent broader security policy issues or organizational practices that require remediation or improvement.